I have obviously heard the depopulation point. Putting my Bill Gates hat on, I’d not want to be getting rid of everyone. The “elites” like their elite stuff, jets and so on, that require a lot of people in the supply chain and servicing that make it happen. So I don’t subscribe to the mass depopulation argumen…
I have obviously heard the depopulation point. Putting my Bill Gates hat on, I’d not want to be getting rid of everyone. The “elites” like their elite stuff, jets and so on, that require a lot of people in the supply chain and servicing that make it happen. So I don’t subscribe to the mass depopulation argument (unless the so called elites are beyond stupid).
So as you say, targeted depopulation. I’ve heard Gates speak. He’s fairly clear about who he wants rid of: it’ll be the economically unproductive. Who are they? Old people and stupid people. Targeting old people is quite easy - the virus itself does that. Stupid people less so. I think he is using fat as a proxy (fat correlates to poverty in the west, and poverty correlates - poorly admittedly - with intelligence). But it’s a biological feature, around 50pct heritable, that has some degree of correlation. And we know the virus targets the obese. So already the virus is targeted (and clearly designed to be so).
I am still not sure how the vaccines fit into this plan. It may be a mopping up exercise to further get rid of the olds and fats, with the unintended consequence in athletes and athletic teens. I don’t know how much was driven by the Gates plan and how much is fear driven lunacy by idiot politicians (I am in the U.K., you can’t tell me cretins like Nadine Dorries are in on any plan. Nobody sane would let them know anything). Look at Gavin Newsom and his denied GBS...he’s a WEF alumnus and he clearly took the vaccines and boosters and not saline.
I am sure that there are those looking to exploit the situation for digital ID and so on. The question is WHY tie all this to a vaccine. Does China even do this? I can understand tying it to biometrics, facial recognition etc, but not your immunity. It doesn’t help you ID or control people.
Unless they are planning to “update” the mRNA ones with something nasty (even more nasty I mean) in the future? But mRNA can only make you express proteins. What protein would give you control over someone?
Digital IDs are necessary for CBDC but they are creating a global system. That sets off alarm bells for me. Will we see a global CBDC? Or will it be national? Just think of the catastrophe that would need to befall this planet to usher in a global currency. Tying it in to the vaccine is just an excuse to get everyone tagged with this ID. No one questions why Big Tech and Big State are colluding to create this system when it's for "our health".
As for the mRNA points, we can only speculate there. I have an open mind on this issue and discount nothing, not even the crazier 5G theories. Just have to wait and see.
But that’s the thing: if it’s about a global CBDC then tying it to a vaccine would be a lot easier if the vaccine were effective and safe. It is neither. Even I might consider it if it were!
So then it maybe is about the mRNA. I hear you on the 5G...so much other stuff has been shown to be more than just conspiracy, it’s worth keeping an open mind.
" (unless the so called elites are beyond stupid). "
Evil is always stupid. Evil people are vapid, shallow and socially inept. What is often mistaken for genius in evil people is really just a form of lowbrow cunning. I wouldn't underestimate the stupidity of evil. That would be as fatal as underestimating the danger.
YES! and the arrogance is usually also very fallible. Just look at the environmental meddling. They do not truly understand complex systems. Mao and the sparrows comes to mind.
I've also heard that number in other globalist circles. If they move forward with depopulation it will be a controllable slow-kill. Everyone on the planet injecting themselves every 3 months is the perfect vehicle for it. We are in some super-serious shit if we can't put a stop to it.
I think that's too small for them to maintain the lifestyle they want, and to control the remaining population sufficiently to deliver it to them. They'll be too busy scrabbling to feed themselves and organise a functioning society to be servicing super yachts and the ports and delivering fuel and food to those ports, and so on. The supply chains involved are enormous and interconnected. You could perhaps lose 10-20% of the population gradually (by 2030) and maintain it, but I don't see any more than that. I haven't done the maths, but intuitively it feels wrong. \
Unless the super elite are happy to go Good Life style self sufficiency, behind a barricade, with a few servants and guards. But how is that a better life for them?
Show me one? They don’t exist yet. And If we are all dead, who’s going to make them? Mine the materials to make them? Fire the power stations to make them? Feed the workers to make them? Maintain the supply chains? Look after their families? Educate their children?
People (those that are left) are going to be too busy grappling with obtaining enough food to fanny about making robots for Bill Gates. Some of them might be so angry they skin his scrawny hide and eat HIM! I hope he has lots of tons of beans in the bunker where he’ll need to spend his final days.
Such a nice open minded discussion below! I am open to all crazy shit at this point. But as a recovering mormon, I don't believe any of it 100%. Yet. I too wonder how the elites envision a paradisical world without 90% of people gone. And why primarily target western nations?? But there are so many unknowns I wouldn't be in the least surprised if there is a plan using technology we are unaware of to replace us with robots or replicators or for them to make the jump to transhumanism without us and just live on forever in a pristine and largely mechanical world. Then it's not about the money. But honestly who knows.
Hmm that's an interesting theory on getting other countries on board. I have to say Mike's comment is very logical. I just find it odd that most of the so called elites are products of the western democracies, it's bonkers that they would cull their own first. But like I said, I question everything I used to know these days and so it's all on the table.
I used to think it was cool that Jacinda was a post-mo (when I wasn't post yet) because there are a lot of admirable things about the church culture. Agree that the zealousness is not one of them however. What I see a lot is post-mos jumping from believing a bunch of nonsense to believing a different bunch of nonsense. Apparently she is no different. It's really disappointing. I feel like after a faith crisis the only path forward is to question everything. I'm puzzled when people don't do that.
Totally get the last point.
I have obviously heard the depopulation point. Putting my Bill Gates hat on, I’d not want to be getting rid of everyone. The “elites” like their elite stuff, jets and so on, that require a lot of people in the supply chain and servicing that make it happen. So I don’t subscribe to the mass depopulation argument (unless the so called elites are beyond stupid).
So as you say, targeted depopulation. I’ve heard Gates speak. He’s fairly clear about who he wants rid of: it’ll be the economically unproductive. Who are they? Old people and stupid people. Targeting old people is quite easy - the virus itself does that. Stupid people less so. I think he is using fat as a proxy (fat correlates to poverty in the west, and poverty correlates - poorly admittedly - with intelligence). But it’s a biological feature, around 50pct heritable, that has some degree of correlation. And we know the virus targets the obese. So already the virus is targeted (and clearly designed to be so).
I am still not sure how the vaccines fit into this plan. It may be a mopping up exercise to further get rid of the olds and fats, with the unintended consequence in athletes and athletic teens. I don’t know how much was driven by the Gates plan and how much is fear driven lunacy by idiot politicians (I am in the U.K., you can’t tell me cretins like Nadine Dorries are in on any plan. Nobody sane would let them know anything). Look at Gavin Newsom and his denied GBS...he’s a WEF alumnus and he clearly took the vaccines and boosters and not saline.
I am sure that there are those looking to exploit the situation for digital ID and so on. The question is WHY tie all this to a vaccine. Does China even do this? I can understand tying it to biometrics, facial recognition etc, but not your immunity. It doesn’t help you ID or control people.
Unless they are planning to “update” the mRNA ones with something nasty (even more nasty I mean) in the future? But mRNA can only make you express proteins. What protein would give you control over someone?
Still thinking it all through, as you can see.
Digital IDs are necessary for CBDC but they are creating a global system. That sets off alarm bells for me. Will we see a global CBDC? Or will it be national? Just think of the catastrophe that would need to befall this planet to usher in a global currency. Tying it in to the vaccine is just an excuse to get everyone tagged with this ID. No one questions why Big Tech and Big State are colluding to create this system when it's for "our health".
As for the mRNA points, we can only speculate there. I have an open mind on this issue and discount nothing, not even the crazier 5G theories. Just have to wait and see.
But that’s the thing: if it’s about a global CBDC then tying it to a vaccine would be a lot easier if the vaccine were effective and safe. It is neither. Even I might consider it if it were!
So then it maybe is about the mRNA. I hear you on the 5G...so much other stuff has been shown to be more than just conspiracy, it’s worth keeping an open mind.
Maybe they never realized the vaccine would be such a disaster. Also, most people think these vaccines are miraculous anyway.
Most people are fools. It's deeply frustrating.
" (unless the so called elites are beyond stupid). "
Evil is always stupid. Evil people are vapid, shallow and socially inept. What is often mistaken for genius in evil people is really just a form of lowbrow cunning. I wouldn't underestimate the stupidity of evil. That would be as fatal as underestimating the danger.
Here’s hoping because that means we’ve a chance.
As a pal used to say, it’s not the fear that gets you, it’s the hope! Every time!
YES! and the arrogance is usually also very fallible. Just look at the environmental meddling. They do not truly understand complex systems. Mao and the sparrows comes to mind.
The Georgia Guidestones indicate 500 million as target population.
The number of Super elite people is very small.
I've also heard that number in other globalist circles. If they move forward with depopulation it will be a controllable slow-kill. Everyone on the planet injecting themselves every 3 months is the perfect vehicle for it. We are in some super-serious shit if we can't put a stop to it.
I think that's too small for them to maintain the lifestyle they want, and to control the remaining population sufficiently to deliver it to them. They'll be too busy scrabbling to feed themselves and organise a functioning society to be servicing super yachts and the ports and delivering fuel and food to those ports, and so on. The supply chains involved are enormous and interconnected. You could perhaps lose 10-20% of the population gradually (by 2030) and maintain it, but I don't see any more than that. I haven't done the maths, but intuitively it feels wrong. \
Unless the super elite are happy to go Good Life style self sufficiency, behind a barricade, with a few servants and guards. But how is that a better life for them?
Maybe, but they’d need far less of everything if there are far fewer people.
That said, if they do this, the law of unintended consequences applies.
Show me one? They don’t exist yet. And If we are all dead, who’s going to make them? Mine the materials to make them? Fire the power stations to make them? Feed the workers to make them? Maintain the supply chains? Look after their families? Educate their children?
People (those that are left) are going to be too busy grappling with obtaining enough food to fanny about making robots for Bill Gates. Some of them might be so angry they skin his scrawny hide and eat HIM! I hope he has lots of tons of beans in the bunker where he’ll need to spend his final days.
😂 stay positive!!!
(I do think Gates should worry. Someone will get him)
Sophocles, yes, inject any old thing they want in the future. Having an injection is a "fix" for whatever angst seems to ail some people that I know.
Bit of black humour in your post "olds and fats".
Plus the "vaccines" get countries in hock to the zillionaires.
Win win for the WEF.
Such a nice open minded discussion below! I am open to all crazy shit at this point. But as a recovering mormon, I don't believe any of it 100%. Yet. I too wonder how the elites envision a paradisical world without 90% of people gone. And why primarily target western nations?? But there are so many unknowns I wouldn't be in the least surprised if there is a plan using technology we are unaware of to replace us with robots or replicators or for them to make the jump to transhumanism without us and just live on forever in a pristine and largely mechanical world. Then it's not about the money. But honestly who knows.
We could read the WEF website.
There are some clues but it's terribly boring and vomit inducing.
I think that the Cult is deluded, but that's the nature of cults.
Jabcinda was a Mormon till age 25. Might explain her zealousness.
Her father was a policeman, explaining the authoritarianism.
Do you think that targeting the Western countries for the Cult's cull helped to bring other countries on board, eg China.
The Cult hates us for sure.
Hmm that's an interesting theory on getting other countries on board. I have to say Mike's comment is very logical. I just find it odd that most of the so called elites are products of the western democracies, it's bonkers that they would cull their own first. But like I said, I question everything I used to know these days and so it's all on the table.
I used to think it was cool that Jacinda was a post-mo (when I wasn't post yet) because there are a lot of admirable things about the church culture. Agree that the zealousness is not one of them however. What I see a lot is post-mos jumping from believing a bunch of nonsense to believing a different bunch of nonsense. Apparently she is no different. It's really disappointing. I feel like after a faith crisis the only path forward is to question everything. I'm puzzled when people don't do that.
Humans are very flawed.
I think it’s only the democracies who might fight back. Hence the intent to take them all out early via a global coup d’etat?