I've also heard that number in other globalist circles. If they move forward with depopulation it will be a controllable slow-kill. Everyone on the planet injecting themselves every 3 months is the perfect vehicle for it. We are in some super-serious shit if we can't put a stop to it.
I think that's too small for them to maintain the lifestyle they want, and to control the remaining population sufficiently to deliver it to them. They'll be too busy scrabbling to feed themselves and organise a functioning society to be servicing super yachts and the ports and delivering fuel and food to those ports, and so on. The supply chains involved are enormous and interconnected. You could perhaps lose 10-20% of the population gradually (by 2030) and maintain it, but I don't see any more than that. I haven't done the maths, but intuitively it feels wrong. \
Unless the super elite are happy to go Good Life style self sufficiency, behind a barricade, with a few servants and guards. But how is that a better life for them?
Show me one? They donтАЩt exist yet. And If we are all dead, whoтАЩs going to make them? Mine the materials to make them? Fire the power stations to make them? Feed the workers to make them? Maintain the supply chains? Look after their families? Educate their children?
People (those that are left) are going to be too busy grappling with obtaining enough food to fanny about making robots for Bill Gates. Some of them might be so angry they skin his scrawny hide and eat HIM! I hope he has lots of tons of beans in the bunker where heтАЩll need to spend his final days.
The Georgia Guidestones indicate 500 million as target population.
The number of Super elite people is very small.
I've also heard that number in other globalist circles. If they move forward with depopulation it will be a controllable slow-kill. Everyone on the planet injecting themselves every 3 months is the perfect vehicle for it. We are in some super-serious shit if we can't put a stop to it.
I think that's too small for them to maintain the lifestyle they want, and to control the remaining population sufficiently to deliver it to them. They'll be too busy scrabbling to feed themselves and organise a functioning society to be servicing super yachts and the ports and delivering fuel and food to those ports, and so on. The supply chains involved are enormous and interconnected. You could perhaps lose 10-20% of the population gradually (by 2030) and maintain it, but I don't see any more than that. I haven't done the maths, but intuitively it feels wrong. \
Unless the super elite are happy to go Good Life style self sufficiency, behind a barricade, with a few servants and guards. But how is that a better life for them?
Maybe, but theyтАЩd need far less of everything if there are far fewer people.
That said, if they do this, the law of unintended consequences applies.
Show me one? They donтАЩt exist yet. And If we are all dead, whoтАЩs going to make them? Mine the materials to make them? Fire the power stations to make them? Feed the workers to make them? Maintain the supply chains? Look after their families? Educate their children?
People (those that are left) are going to be too busy grappling with obtaining enough food to fanny about making robots for Bill Gates. Some of them might be so angry they skin his scrawny hide and eat HIM! I hope he has lots of tons of beans in the bunker where heтАЩll need to spend his final days.
ЁЯШВ stay positive!!!
(I do think Gates should worry. Someone will get him)