Then, after the obligatory disclaimer "I'm not a historian/scientist, but", may I just throw in something in, just for the sake of, well, I don't know - my own education?
First, I have read a great deal of Anatoly Fomenko's work and my main take away is this: *all* sacred texts are actually ancient astronomical descriptions and forecastings recycled into Earthbound mythologies and hagiographies of mainly fictionalized/romanticized historical characters - the main one being Christ, obviously - who are supposed to have lived in places that don't have anything to do with their actual denomination - the main one being Jerusalem, which is actually a *concept* rather than an actual city - in times that are chronogically severely ill-defined. Those ancient texts are also not so ancient, either, the Bible having been written up until the XVIth century. So, prophecies, self-fulfilling or not, are at best misintepretations, at worst, scams. I realize that the notion that History is the mother of all scams might not go down well with you being an historian - but there it is. Please don't spare my feelings.
Second, there isn't such a thing as a "nuclear weapon". I first dug into that rabbit hole through Miles Mathis (original article here http://mileswmathis.com/trinity.pdf, my translation here http://skidmark.blog/2022/08/10/le-canular-nucleaire-par-miles-mathis/), meaning that Hiroshima and Nagazaki were wooden cities carpet bombed with incendiary bombs. You can find all manners of picture analysis on the Net that all seem to prove it. I have since bumped into more scientific ways to argue the point, and they all seem to hold water pretty well. I'm sure there are very powerful conventional weapons to bomb whole countries into oblivion, but nuclear Armageddon is just one more fairy tale in a long list of fairy tales.
If there is a regional war, this atheist believes Israel will be defeated. Their nukes won't save them.
The demise of the Zionist project will claim the lives of millions, mostly non-atheists. And I'm okay with that. Ye reap what ye sow, true believers.
What a waste, mostly because the human ape cannot accept it's own mortality. It has to invent narratives about reincarnation, an afterlife, a god with anger management issues masquerading as "love", and a bevy of beautiful virgins. Or gorgeous house cats. The half of humanity not fixated on virginity is rarely heard from on these divine matters, so I'm guessing they might prefer house cats.
If there's no regional war, you have my condolences.
Well that's put Turkey further down my list for next year's holiday, then.
Seriously though, thank you for touching on such a deep and touchy subject. One of many questions I have is about the US. Do you think there are people running that country who are not part of this global elite who have secretly been running things for centuries? A US "elite", who are concerned about the US and it's position in the world and are not going to go along with the New World Order?
I wrote another comment on your other post Laurence, but this one also motivated me to comment - it's downright spooky watching you figuring all this out, it's like getting a window back in time to me a year or so back having all the pieces but not yet able to see the picture (or indeed knowing that there was a completely coherent picture that they fit together into), I simply couldn't comprehend what I was looking at and was desperately trying to force it into a scientific/materialist mold which it wouldn't fit into (and it never will).
You know so much, yet you are so far from the truth, and simultaneously you're about 2 minutes away from it all making complete sense. What you're looking at is the book of Revelation, and yes it's really happening, no rational argument can be made that human beings (no matter how powerful, connected or organised) could orchestrate all this.
Hello again!
For the record, I'm the one who translated your article https://renegademind.substack.com/p/a-cold-dark-winter-is-coming into French http://skidmark.blog/2022/09/28/un-hiver-froid-et-sombre-sannonce-par-laurence-flynn/. And a very good article it was, too. Now I might do the same with this one, if you don't mind, because it definitely has merit.
Then, after the obligatory disclaimer "I'm not a historian/scientist, but", may I just throw in something in, just for the sake of, well, I don't know - my own education?
First, I have read a great deal of Anatoly Fomenko's work and my main take away is this: *all* sacred texts are actually ancient astronomical descriptions and forecastings recycled into Earthbound mythologies and hagiographies of mainly fictionalized/romanticized historical characters - the main one being Christ, obviously - who are supposed to have lived in places that don't have anything to do with their actual denomination - the main one being Jerusalem, which is actually a *concept* rather than an actual city - in times that are chronogically severely ill-defined. Those ancient texts are also not so ancient, either, the Bible having been written up until the XVIth century. So, prophecies, self-fulfilling or not, are at best misintepretations, at worst, scams. I realize that the notion that History is the mother of all scams might not go down well with you being an historian - but there it is. Please don't spare my feelings.
Second, there isn't such a thing as a "nuclear weapon". I first dug into that rabbit hole through Miles Mathis (original article here http://mileswmathis.com/trinity.pdf, my translation here http://skidmark.blog/2022/08/10/le-canular-nucleaire-par-miles-mathis/), meaning that Hiroshima and Nagazaki were wooden cities carpet bombed with incendiary bombs. You can find all manners of picture analysis on the Net that all seem to prove it. I have since bumped into more scientific ways to argue the point, and they all seem to hold water pretty well. I'm sure there are very powerful conventional weapons to bomb whole countries into oblivion, but nuclear Armageddon is just one more fairy tale in a long list of fairy tales.
If there is a regional war, this atheist believes Israel will be defeated. Their nukes won't save them.
The demise of the Zionist project will claim the lives of millions, mostly non-atheists. And I'm okay with that. Ye reap what ye sow, true believers.
What a waste, mostly because the human ape cannot accept it's own mortality. It has to invent narratives about reincarnation, an afterlife, a god with anger management issues masquerading as "love", and a bevy of beautiful virgins. Or gorgeous house cats. The half of humanity not fixated on virginity is rarely heard from on these divine matters, so I'm guessing they might prefer house cats.
If there's no regional war, you have my condolences.
Well that's put Turkey further down my list for next year's holiday, then.
Seriously though, thank you for touching on such a deep and touchy subject. One of many questions I have is about the US. Do you think there are people running that country who are not part of this global elite who have secretly been running things for centuries? A US "elite", who are concerned about the US and it's position in the world and are not going to go along with the New World Order?
Interesting. Have you read the Christian/Gnostic science fiction of Philip K. Dick? I think you would enjoy his novels Valis and The Divine Invasion.
I wrote another comment on your other post Laurence, but this one also motivated me to comment - it's downright spooky watching you figuring all this out, it's like getting a window back in time to me a year or so back having all the pieces but not yet able to see the picture (or indeed knowing that there was a completely coherent picture that they fit together into), I simply couldn't comprehend what I was looking at and was desperately trying to force it into a scientific/materialist mold which it wouldn't fit into (and it never will).
You know so much, yet you are so far from the truth, and simultaneously you're about 2 minutes away from it all making complete sense. What you're looking at is the book of Revelation, and yes it's really happening, no rational argument can be made that human beings (no matter how powerful, connected or organised) could orchestrate all this.