28 Comments

Good analysis of the current crisis.

No scholar of English history, I knew that the royals assiduously avoided the name "John" but was unaware that "Charlie" was not that much better.

Speaking of portents, as a Christian, I hearken back to the fire that nearly destroyed Notre Dame Cathedral during Holy Week of 2019. A warning from Our Lady of what was to come, perhaps. It also allowed the bloody globalists to test-run their "build back better" slogan. In the end, this towering achievement of Western Civilization was not destroyed. We must remain hopeful. Suffering is in our future, but we will prevail.

Expand full comment
Sep 12, 2022Liked by Laurence Flynn

Without petrochemical fertilizers, I guess we will have to go organic, then. Silver lining.

Expand full comment
Sep 13, 2022Liked by Laurence Flynn

"the fire occurred during the longest-running Parliament in English history, known as the Cavalier Parliament. It lasted from 1661 to 1679, accounting for 18 years of Charles II’s 25-year reign. That should raise a huge red fag, indicating that the bankers had several high-priority agendas that needed rubber-stamping during this time. Indeed, a quick read through its Wikipedia page shows the Cavalier Parliament’s 18 years were a time of pretty much constant crisis in England, followed by fascist legislation and sundry nefarious dealings. Remember, this was the very beginning of the Restoration period, immediately following Cromwell’s Commonwealth. Reading history backwards as we are now obliged to do, it’s clear the Commonwealth era was simply a setup for the Restoration, during which time some of the most fascist and pro-banking legislation got pushed through – all with the approval of Charles II and the Cavalier Parliament. This included the Corporation Act and Clarendon Code which gave massive power to the protestant (Komnene controlled) church; the Quaker Act which curbed religious freedom; the Licensing of the Press Act which gave government power to censor the press; laws promoting the English linen industry (who would want to do that? I’ll give you one guess…) and various mercantilist laws that gave special privileges to the EIC; the highly unpopular hearth tax, which required tax collectors to go inside people’s homes to count hearths; and the infamous Poor Laws which were laws against the poor, not for them. Speaking of which, it was under the Cavalier Parliament that England’s pauper population grew to unprecedented numbers, which just goes to show how unabashed these wig-headed aristocrats were about enriching themselves at the expense of everyone else. It was the most blatantly corrupt government Britain had ever had up to that point. " http://mileswmathis.com/1666.pdf

Expand full comment
Sep 12, 2022Liked by Laurence Flynn

Thanks for the great monday read! Disheartened to corroborate the "suck it up suckers" messaging coming from the WEF puppets as our Minister of Finance in the Netherlands said basically the same thing as Macron. I love how these people keep trying the same trick: virus? just push pause! energy crisis? just push pause! unhappy in the body you were born in? just push pause. WTF? Anyone with a brain should tell them to sit down already. Sadly, most citizens are still woefully clueless. One of our better politicians was interviewed last week and the bimbo asking the questions posed something about speeding up the energy transition with wind farms etc. The poor man visibly gathered his patience to explain to her that wind energy produces electricity, it is the gas that we are having problems with. How do people not know this stuff? We installed 40 solar panels, not in fear of an impending energy crisis, but to take advantage of the soon-to-be-conveniently-phased-out subsidies. We already explored how to transition our home (which is only 20 years old, compared to many buildings that are 10 or 20 times older) to electricity. Short answer is, it can't be done until battery storage is smaller and more affordable and not unimportantly, there are enough technicians available to carry out the work. There is NO WAY they are going to figure this out in a couple months let alone a couple years. The sooner we admit that, the sooner we can get on with life. I am all about taking care of the planet. Thankfully I have learned that the people who talk the loudest about that a) have no fucking clue what they are talking about and b) have no fucking empathy for the people who have to foot the bill, literally and figuratively. Democracy in the West appears to be dead, so as far as that goes, a new British monarch is perhaps the perfect bookend for our times. PS: I don't think Elizabeth II had any reasonable expectation of becoming Queen when she named her first child. But I did appreciate the historic reminders!

Expand full comment

Excellent article worthy of a translation into French.

Done!

http://skidmark.blog/2022/09/28/un-hiver-froid-et-sombre-sannonce-par-laurence-flynn/

Expand full comment
Sep 12, 2022Liked by Laurence Flynn

Can the king's consort become queen?

If so, Charles can expect some rat poison in his cornflakes.

On a more serious note, it appears that Europe will allow market forces to distribute its energy shortage. A more cautious approach would involve rationing.

Expand full comment

It's worse than this but if you live in Western Europe, the prosperity of the past, for those who had much of any of it, has gone - for most.

Dealt with in depth under The Decline of The West as This Century belongs to The Great Eurasian Union . . . https://les7eb.substack.com/

Expand full comment